新房被当样板间能索赔吗?Is bridal chamber become between example can claim for compensation? 新房被當樣板間能索賠嗎?

2017年2月26日

  ■时报记者  张玮报道

  新房找装饰公司装修完毕却成了装饰公司的“样板间”,进行了一个多月的宣传,家住贻港城的王阿姨急了,找到律师希望能讨个说法。

  王阿姨去年购买了塘沽贻港城的一套两室一厅,准备给儿子做婚房。由于平时家人都工作很忙,没有时间打理新房,于是王阿姨就将装修包给了某装饰公司。双方签订了一份装修合同,注明两个月完工。然而两个月过去了,王阿姨一家正好赶上有事外出,没有及时去验收装修完毕的新房,新房的钥匙就交给了装饰公司保存。又过去了一个多月,王阿姨去验收新房,发现屋里新铺的木地板、墙面和门上多了很多手印脚印。经过一番打听,她才得知,在没有验收房子的这一个多月期间,装饰公司经常带客户来看“样板”。王阿姨了解情况后大怒,找到装修公司,可公司负责人称,由于王阿姨晚了一个多月验收,已经耽误了公司的正常进度,他们带客人随便看看装修效果也不是什么大事。可王阿姨不这样认为,自己儿子的新房,被人当广告,还让那么多人参观,自己心里很不舒服,而且装饰公司带客户参观肯定多签订了很多合同,自己等于在不知情的情况下给人做了广告,因此她要求装饰公司对新房进行清洁并支付“样板间”赔偿。

  律师说法:

  金诺律师事务所冯建魁律师表示,装饰公司在没有经过业主同意的情况下,带客户多次往返该新房参观导致该房屋地址等内容公之于众,很可能影响到该房屋业主今后的正常生活,因此装饰公司私自把业主房屋当做“样板间”的做法有欠妥当,王阿姨要求装饰公司对新房进行清洁也是合理的。

  对于王阿姨所说装饰公司拿新房做了广告给该公司创造了收益,律师则认为这方面很难举证。如果王阿姨能够找出装饰公司利用新房创造收益的证据,那么她才能要求该公司支付所谓的“样板间”赔偿。

下面是尤洪涛翻译所得
■ times reporter Zhang Wei reports

Bridal chamber looks for adornment company to decorate those who ended to become adornment company however ” between example ” , undertook the conduct propaganda of a many month, the king aunt that lives in city of leave behind harbor is urgent, find a lawyer to hope to be able to denounce a view.

A when king aunt bought town of harbor of pond buy leave behind last year two rooms one hall, preparation makes marriage room to the son. As a result of at ordinary times family works very busy, do bridal chamber without time, then king aunt will decorate a bag to give some adornment the company. Both sides signed to decorate a contract, make clear two months finishing. However two months went, an as it happens catchs up with king aunt occupied go out, was not checked and accept in time decorate ending bridal chamber, the key of bridal chamber gave adornment company is saved. Went again a many month, king aunt goes checking and accept bridal chamber, discover the lays newly wood floor in house, metope and door to go up a lot of more fingerprint footmark. Ask through, she just is informed, during much without a this when check and accept a house month, adornment company often takes a client to look ” example ” . King aunt understands the bate after the circumstance, find decorate a company, but company controller says, because king aunt became late,a many month is checked and accept, had delayed the normal plan of the company, they take a guest to look casually decorating the effect also is not what important matter. But king aunt does not think so, the bridal chamber of own son, be become advertisement, still let so much ginseng watch, in him heart very uncomfortable, and adornment company takes a client to visited affirmation to sign a lot of contracts more, oneself are equal to ad was made to the person below unwitting circumstance, accordingly she asks to decorate a company to undertake cleanness and pay to bridal chamber ” between example ” compensation.

Lawyer argument:

Feng Jiankui of office of Jin Nuo’s attorney’s lawyer expresses, adornment company is below the circumstance that did not agree through owner, take a client for many times to go back and forth between this bridal chamber to look around bring about content of this building letterhead fair at numerous, affect this building owner probably the normal life henceforth, because this decorates company privately to treat owner house as ” between example ” the practice has not proper to become, king aunt asks to decorate a company to undertake to bridal chamber cleanness also is reasonable.

Did advertisement to create profit to this company to what king aunt says to decorate a company to take bridal chamber, the lawyer thinks this side is very bad quote. If king aunt can find out adornment company to use bridal chamber to create the evidence of accrual, so she just can ask this company pays so called ” between example ” compensation.
下面是王晗翻译所得
  ■時報記者  張瑋報道

  新房找裝飾公司裝修完畢卻成瞭裝飾公司的“樣板間”,進行瞭一個多月的宣傳,傢住貽港城的王阿姨急瞭,找到律師希望能討個說法。

  王阿姨去年購買瞭塘沽貽港城的一套兩室一廳,準備給兒子做婚房。由於平時傢人都工作很忙,沒有時間打理新房,於是王阿姨就將裝修包給瞭某裝飾公司。雙方簽訂瞭一份裝修合同,註明兩個月完工。然而兩個月過去瞭,王阿姨一傢正好趕上有事外出,沒有及時去驗收裝修完畢的新房,新房的鑰匙就交給瞭裝飾公司保存。又過去瞭一個多月,王阿姨去驗收新房,發現屋裡新鋪的木地板、墻面和門上多瞭很多手印腳印。經過一番打聽,她才得知,在沒有驗收房子的這一個多月期間,裝飾公司經常帶客戶來看“樣板”。王阿姨瞭解情況後大怒,找到裝修公司,可公司負責人稱,由於王阿姨晚瞭一個多月驗收,已經耽誤瞭公司的正常進度,他們帶客人隨便看看裝修效果也不是什麼大事。可王阿姨不這樣認為,自己兒子的新房,被人當廣告,還讓那麼多人參觀,自己心裡很不舒服,而且裝飾公司帶客戶參觀肯定多簽訂瞭很多合同,自己等於在不知情的情況下給人做瞭廣告,因此她要求裝飾公司對新房進行清潔並支付“樣板間”賠償。

  律師說法:

  金諾律師事務所馮建魁律師表示,裝飾公司在沒有經過業主同意的情況下,帶客戶多次往返該新房參觀導致該房屋地址等內容公之於眾,很可能影響到該房屋業主今後的正常生活,因此裝飾公司私自把業主房屋當做“樣板間”的做法有欠妥當,王阿姨要求裝飾公司對新房進行清潔也是合理的。

  對於王阿姨所說裝飾公司拿新房做瞭廣告給該公司創造瞭收益,律師則認為這方面很難舉證。如果王阿姨能夠找出裝飾公司利用新房創造收益的證據,那麼她才能要求該公司支付所謂的“樣板間”賠償。

没有评论

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注